Why is TikTok being targeted by the RESTRICT Act?
It seems to be the US government’s best shot of finally banning TikTok
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Here’s how it works.
After years of trying, the RESTRICT Act appears to be the US government’s best shot so far of finally achieving one of its long-awaited goals: banning TikTok.
A possibleTikTok banhas been, in fact, the #1 hot topic this year. Many countries around the world have already forbidden using the Chinese-owned video sharing-appon government devices. However, if the popular social media is finally blocked for all Americans, aVPN servicemay be needed to keep accessing the app.
But why does the White House seek to restrict TikTok in the first place? And why does the US government need a new law for doing so?
TikTok’s privacy problems
Perhaps themost downloaded appworldwide, TikTok counts over 150 million users in the US alone. While the video-sharing app got famous for its short viral videos and glamorous influencers, it is now for its aggressive data collection practices.
These include a hungry data-driven algorithm, itsin-app browser, and constrained privacy settings. Its tracking methods are very intrusive, too, as they collect tons of user data likekeystroke patterns, location, browser history, and even biometric information.
Especially problematic seems to be TikTok’s Focused View, a feature unique to business accounts able to even track people’s personal interactions.
“This is not only an invasion of privacy, but is opening the gate for dystopian claims of invasive-emotion detection - both incredibly frightening, and often unscientific,“said Estelle Massé, Global Data Protection Lead at Access Now, one of the privacy advocates warning of the risks of such functionality.
Are you a pro? Subscribe to our newsletter
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
TikTok CEO set to pledge app’s “responsibility to protect” US users>Should I delete TikTok? Well, yes, if you care about your privacy>Our pick of the best TikTok VPN around right now
Nonetheless, the public is getting quite nervous about the matter. As our exclusive survey showed, most people areput off by TikTok’s personal data gathering. However, despite TikTok’s privacy issues being concerning, popular US-owned platforms aren’t much different.
For instance, Facebook and Instagram use proprietary in-app browsers too, while, also the likes ofGoogleandMicrosoftare notorious for collecting vast amounts of personal data.
That’s why privacy advocates are pushing for a comprehensive data privacy regulation like the proposedADPPA, instead. Contrary to the EU, UK and many other countries, the US still lacks aGDPR-like legislation to protect citizens from data collection abuses.
Such a law “will have a real impact” by protecting citizens' data no matter the platform, digital rights advocacy group the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) argues in ablog post.
“Foreign adversaries won’t be able to get our data from social media companies if the social media companies aren’t allowed to collect, retain, and sell it in the first place.”
TikTok’s links with China
“Foreign adversaries”—that’s the key term here. In fact, theRESTRICT Acthas been presented as a framework to review and restrict certain information communication technologies where US user data interacts with foreign adversaries.
What are these countries? So far, China, Cuba, Iran, Russia, Venezuela and North Korea make up the blacklist, but the government would be able to add new entries in the future.
TikTok is owned and operated by Chinese software company ByteDance—an ownership that the US has always looked upon with great suspicion. Those concerns have been escalated lately.
In November last year, FBI director Christopher Wray raised the alarm on how China mightweaponize users' databelonging to US citizens.
This isn’t simply conjecture either, and the tech company isn’t without blame. In fact, the news that some ByteDance employees had been spying on some US journalists—an isolated event, the company claims—has helped to consolidate those fears.
Now, lawmakers are calling for a total ban citing national security concerns.
Yes American social media companies also collect data on Americans and that should be addressed But @tiktok_us is another level of dangerThey don’t just collect data for their own use,they are controlled by & directly give our data to a foreign government in #ChinaDecember 14, 2022
Some US politicians are also worried about on how TikTok might be pushing content to favor Chinese Communist Party’s political views, too. As Wray put it, for “brainwashing the youth.”
TikTok strongly rejects such allegations. “TikTok has never shared, or received a request to share, U.S. user data with the Chinese government. Nor would TikTok honor such a request if one were ever made,” itsCEO Shou Zi Chew pledgedat a congressional hearing recently.
The social media giant has also been working with US company Oracle on the so-calledProject Texasto ensure US user data cannot be accessed by foreign actors.
Many commentators believe, in fact, that the proposed TikTok ban might be more motivated by geopolitical concerns instead of concrete evidence.
“Before taking such a drastic step, the government must come forward with specific evidence showing, at the very least, a real problem and a narrowly tailored solution. So far, the government hasn’t done so,“wrote EFF.
TikTok ban’s legal issues
As tensions grow, the White House and its allies have been taking precautions.
TikTok has, in fact, already been banned from government devices in and out of the US over recent months. Doing so turned out to be relatively straightforward. However, an outright ban or forced sale will have some legal challenges to overcome.
After all, former President Trump already tried a similar action in 2020. TikTok challenged this in court at the time and, surprise, it won. The measures were then revoked by Biden when he came into power.
That’s because such provisions go against the First Amendment which protects Americans' freedom of speech—with or without foreign adversaries' involvement. Another law, so-called the Berman Amendments, also restricts the President’s power in regulating the free flow of information in and out of the country.
Earlier this year, other bills—namely theData Actand theANTI-SOCIAL CCP Act—tried to find a solution to this conundrum. According to experts, these provisions will fail to do so.
That’s exactly where the RESTRICT Act comes in. The proposed bill is, in fact, going to exempt certain information services from the Berman Amendments. This would finally give the US government the constitutional power to regulate foreign technologies deemed as dangerous.
TikTok ban: how likely is it?
As we have seen, the RESTRICT Act comes as a means to make a total ban a legal outcome to achieve in the US. However, there are still quite a few logistical challenges to cope with it.
Many US tech companies, including the biggest likeApple, have parts of their operations based in China and other potential adversaries countries, for example.
On top of that, such a decision could open up to further geopolitical repercussions—think if Chinese Communist Party responded with similar blocks on US businesses operating in China as well.
TikTok has been, in fact,branding this campaignas a “politically-motivated ban that will do nothing to advance the national security of the United States.”
More importantly—for American users, at least—civil societies and privacy experts are warning that a total ban will curb people’s freedom of speech and their right to access information.
“Prohibiting the use of certain technologies or social media sitesbleakly opposes the vision of an open and free digital world and raises serious concerns over the future of digital freedom in the US,“secure VPNproviderPrivate Internet Accesstold TechRadar.
Whether or not a TikTok ban will be eventually implemented, you should probably consider getting aTikTok VPNto make sure of accessing the app no matter the lawmakers' final decision.
Chiara is a multimedia journalist committed to covering stories to help promote the rights and denounce the abuses of the digital side of life—wherever cybersecurity, markets and politics tangle up.She mainly writes news, interviews and analysis on data privacy, online censorship, digital rights, cybercrime, and security software, with a special focus on VPNs, for TechRadar Pro, TechRadar and Tom’s Guide. Got a story, tip-off or something tech-interesting to say? Reach out to chiara.castro@futurenet.com
This new phishing strategy utilizes GitHub comments to distribute malware
Should your VPN always be on?
5 must-have Android apps
