Samsung’s Galaxy S23 moon photo mess reminds us that, thanks to AI, nothing is real
Divorced from reality
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Here’s how it works.
Samsunghas never lied to us about itsSamsung Galaxy S23 Ultra’smoon photography capabilities. The powerful 6.8-inch Android handset expertly delivers images of the moon.
It does not give you a picture of the real moon.
There. See how that clears things up? Don’t you feel better now?
Right. No, you don’t.
Samsung’s blog postdetailing exactly, or almost exactly, how its Space Zoom, in tandem with AI, image processing, screen brightness reduction, and the Detail Enhancement Engine, all of which feed into Samsung’s Scene Optimizer, makes images of the moon reveals, perhaps for the first time, that Samsung was never letting us simply take photos of the moon.
If you need further proof, here’s the money sentence, buried at the bottom of the illuminating post:
“Samsung continues to improve Scene Optimizer to reduce any potential confusion that may occur between the act of taking a picture of the real moon and an image of the moon.”
Your AI partners
What we have here is very much like the partnership that exists between humans andChatGPT,Midjourney, orDALL-E. We ask those generative AIs to give us images and text that fulfill our prompts, and they each dutifully do so, some more effectively than others.
When you point your Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra,Galaxy S23 Plus, or even theGalaxy S23at the moon, you’re engaging Samsung’s AI (the Detail Enhancement engine) for the task of creating an image of the moon.
It’s a big job that’s full of lots of twists and turns as the system uses what it knows of the moon we’ve photographed countless times from Earth (and with some really excellent cameras and big lenses) and in some fashion – it’s not clear how – combines that information with the garbage, noise-filled optical image the Galaxy S23 Ultra’s best 10X telephoto camera can see.
After that, it’s off to the races.
As you can see above, it’s still quite easy to see the difference between a moon image produced by the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, and a moon photo taken with a real camera and telephoto lens.
Photos vs images
What we now know is that the final result is not a patchwork of previously captured moon photos spliced together like a ransom note. No, this is something new and different.
It’s a brand-new image of the moon created by Samsung’s AI master, otherwise known as Scene Optimizer. If you turn that off, you’re back to the blurry, useless photo of the real moon that you would probably never share.
Samsung’s efforts are part of a larger truth. We now live in a world where the unseen hand of AI is influencing all of our digital experiences.
Nothing is pure, and increasingly a lot isn’t real.
Everything we write is being munged by AI, whether you have an AI-powered grammar and spellchecker, or you’re letting AI rewrite some of your sentences. Your emails are completed byGoogle’s AI (and with generative AI coming to all theWorkspace apps, that will soon be even more the case).
Every photo we take on all the major flagship phones, including your beloved iPhone 14 ProandGoogle Pixel 7is fondled first by AI. We never get just one image or one pixel. The image processor applies a neural network to your most mundane photos, and remakes them so they’re uniformly wonderful.
We watch television onthe best TVspre-processed by AI so it looks better. I have no idea what movies and TV might look like without it. To get pure, unadulterated entertainment, I probably have to go to the theater.
You might think Samsung lied to us. It promised exceptional Space Zoom moon images and we got… exceptional Space Zoom moon images.
Yes, they were also impossible. You can’t suddenly make an optical lens pull in more real information than it can see. So Samsung switched from talking about photos of the real moon toimagesof the moon.
Can we stop?
Instead of railing at Samsung, it’s time to recognize how AI is altering our worldview, and to decide if that’s the world we really want.
Maybe we choose to turn off scene optimization, and buy one of thebest mirrorless camerasand a huge lens so that we can capture real photos of a real moon; maybe we turn off Grammarly and Gmail smart compose and AI-assisted spell check, and we turn off image processing on all platforms and for all photos.
The world gets a little more real, but maybe a lot duller.
I bet we make our peace with that invisible AI hand, and eventually forget it existed in the first place. Who cares what’s real when it all looks so good?
Get the best Black Friday deals direct to your inbox, plus news, reviews, and more.
Sign up to be the first to know about unmissable Black Friday deals on top tech, plus get all your favorite TechRadar content.
A 38-year industry veteran andaward-winning journalist, Lance has covered technology since PCs were the size of suitcases and “on line” meant “waiting.” He’s a former Lifewire Editor-in-Chief, Mashable Editor-in-Chief, and, before that, Editor in Chief of PCMag.com and Senior Vice President of Content for Ziff Davis, Inc. He also wrote a popular, weekly tech column for Medium called The Upgrade.
Lance Ulanoffmakes frequent appearances on national, international, and local news programs including Live with Kelly and Mark, theToday Show, Good Morning America, CNBC, CNN, and the BBC.
We might have our first look at the long-rumored Samsung tri-fold
Samsung reveals its next-gen Bixby AI – a Galaxy brain to rival ChatGPT and Gemini
NYT Strands today — hints, answers and spangram for Sunday, November 10 (game #252)
