16K displays are already here to bring future Nvidia and AMD GPUs to their knees
Chinese display giant shows off 110-inch prototype monitor as market waits for more 8K screens
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Here’s how it works.
Chinese display behemoth BOE showcased a 110-inch16Kdisplay at the Display Week 2023, hosted by the Society for Information Displays (SID). Journalist veteran,Vincent Teohfrom HDTVtest, came across the prototype and posted the specs of the beast: 60Hz refresh rate, 400 nits maximum brightness and a contrast ratio of 1200:1.
These are average specs for a panel, which underlines the fact that the standout feature is its 16K resolution. The panel is likely to be an uncut mother glass as it is equivalent to four 55-inch8Kdisplays in a 2x2 matrix (or 16 27.5-inch4Kones in a 4x4 matrix).
This is not the first 16K panel to be produced; Innolux, another major panel vendor, released a smaller 100-inch one back in August 2018 and bothSonyandSamsunghave modular 16K displays but with exorbitant prices (in the millions of dollars for theCrystal LEDandThe Wall). So the technology is not only proven and mature, it is also widely available. So what’s the blocker?
16K content, the missing link
16K smashes the 100 million pixel barrier, reaching more than 132 million of these tiny dots (15360 × 8640 pixels, that’s a pixel density of 160 pixels per inch), which is a lot, especially for gaming and applications requiring high refresh rates; it is however only a matter of time before graphics cards reach that resolution.AMDannounced back in 2016 that its ambition would be to deliver a graphic cards that can support 16K resolution at 240Hz.
No graphics card currently support 16K: the closest one to do so is the recently releasedAMD Radeon Pro W7900is the first of its kind that supports DisplayPort 2.1, a new standard that can drive up to 16K resolution but has been downgraded to 12K by AMD, probably because of performance.
There’s simply not much to do with a 16K monitor or TV as there’s hardly any content produced in that resolution. Not that it is impossible to do so; Sony had the technology to do16K since 2014, almost a decade ago and a little known company produced Prairie Wind, thefirst 16K movie, using twoCanonstill cameras.
And we can’t possibly ignore the fact that200-million pixel camera sensors have been available since 2019and smartphones with 200 megapixel cameras are already here (e.g.Motorola Edge 30 Ultra). Could it be that what we have right now is good enough?
Are you a pro? Subscribe to our newsletter
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
The 8K mirage
It’s all good that we’re talking about 16K right now as we’ve yet to see any new 8K monitors (not TV) in the market.
As I wrote earlier in 2023, I don’t believe that8K monitorswill ever go mainstream.Dell’sUltrasharp UP3218 monitorwas the first one launched and remains the only widely available 8K mainstream monitor, more than five years after it was released. I, for one, fear that 16K will only remain a pipedream because the market is too small to be relevant, with the majority of the worldwide content still produced, consumed and viewed at full HD, a resolution that’s 64 times smaller than 16K. Check out the short YouTube video below of the BOE 16K display.
Désiré has been musing and writing about technology during a career spanning four decades. He dabbled inwebsite buildersandweb hostingwhen DHTML and frames were in vogue and started narrating about the impact of technology on society just before the start of the Y2K hysteria at the turn of the last millennium.
Samsung plans record-breaking 400-layer NAND chip that could be key to breaking 200TB barrier for ultra large capacity AI hyperscaler SSDs
Adobe’s decision to eliminate perpetual licensing for its Elements software has stirred controversy among consumers
Red One isn’t perfect but it proves we need more action-packed Christmas movies
